Jaron Lanier Quotes
-
There will always be humans, lots of them, who provide the data that makes the networked realization of any technology better and cheaper.
→ -
I think seeking perfection in human affairs is a perfect way to destroy them.
→ -
I think most of the dramatic new ideas come from little companies that then grow big.
→ -
Here’s a current example of the challenge we face. At the height of its power, the photography company Kodak employed more than 140,000 people and was worth $28 billion. They even invented the first digital camera. But today Kodak is bankrupt, and the new face of digital photography has become Instagram. When Instagram was sold to Facebook for a billion dollars in 2012, it employed only thirteen people. Where did all those jobs disappear to? And what happened to the wealth that all those middle-class jobs created?
→ -
Is war an inevitable outcome of competing interests in a complex society? In other words, would war be the same even if human nature were very different? There are mathematical models of large groups working together that lead to conflict on a reliable basis. So there's a whole other view of war that is not psychological at all.
→ -
A real friendship ought to introduce each person to unexpected weirdness in the other.
→ -
Making information free is survivable so long as only limited numbers of people are disenfranchised. As much as it pains me to say so, we can survive if we only destroy the middle classes of musicians, journalists, and photographers. What is not survivable is the additional destruction of the middle classes in transportation, manufacturing, energy, office work, education, and health care. And all that destruction will come surely enough if the dominant idea of an information economy isn't improved.
→ -
There is nothing more gray, stultifying, or dreary than life lived inside the confines of a theory.
→ -
Our times demand rejection of seven word bios.
→ -
Of all the things you can spend a lot of money on, the only things you expect to fail frequently are software and medicine.
→ -
If war stems from unmet needs related to male adolescent ritual, that's something that we need to examine. I'm interested in the possibility of simply getting rid of war. I'd be no more willing to let go of that than to let go of the possibility of eradicating cancer. That's not to say I'm certain we can, but I am willing to use any energy at all in the quest.
→ -
Individual web pages as they first appeared in the early 1990s had the flavour of person-hood. MySpace preserved some of that flavour, though a process of regularized formatting had begun. Facebook went further, organizing people into multiple-choice identities while Wikipedia seeks to erase point of view entirely. If a church or government were doing these things, it would feel authoritarian, but when technologists are the culprits, we seem hip, fresh, and inventive. People accept ideas presented in technological form that would be abhorrent in any other forms
→ -
I'm hoping the reader can see that artificial intelligence is better understood as a belief system instead of a technology.
→ -
If you want to know what's really going on in a society or ideology, follow the money. If money is flowing to advertising instead of musicians, journalists, and artists, then a society is more concerned with manipulation than truth or beauty.
→ -
Google's thing is not advertising because it's not a romanticizing operation. It doesn't involve expression. It's a link. What they're doing is selling access.
→ -
There were studies that asked people in different cultures to draw pictures of their enemies, and the pictures all looked remarkably the same. They always had exaggerated canine teeth and a certain sort of expression. That led to speculation about whether at an earlier stage in the human experience we were hunted by some sort of carnivore.
→ -
To me, to say that war isn't evil is to say that nothing is evil.
→ -
We should talk about the ultimate cause of war. It's a question we should never stop asking, because if we do, there's a chance, however remote, that we might miss an opportunity to reduce the occurrence of war.
→ -
In history, in most cultures, and at most points in time, if you want to find the most advanced technologies, you can look principally in two places. One is weapons and the other is musical instruments. My hypothesis is that instruments are usually ahead of weapons. In fact, I think you can find many examples of instruments being predecessors of weapons and very few in the reverse.
→ -
Spirituality is committing suicide. Consciousness is attempting to will itself out of existence.
→ -
If you love a medium made of software, there's a danger that you will become entrapped in someone else's recent careless thoughts. Struggle against that.
→ -
Why do people deserve a penny when they update their Facebook status? Because they'll spend some of it on you.
→ -
People try to treat technology as an object, and it can't be. It can only be a channel.
→ -
You have to be somebody before you can share yourself.
→ -
At the turn of the [21st] century it was really Sergey Brin at Google who just had the thought of, well, if we give away all the information services, but we make money from advertising, we can make information free and still have capitalism. But the problem with that is it reneges on the social contract where people still participate in the formal economy. And it's a kind of capitalism that's totally self-defeating because it's so narrow. It's a winner-take-all capitalism that's not sustaining.
→ -
We're losing track of the vastness of the potential for computer science. We really have to revive the beautiful intellectual joy of it, as opposed to the business potential.
→ -
It is impossible to work in information technology without also engaging in social engineering.
→ -
People degrade themselves in order to make machines seem smart all the time.
→ -
After my mother's death, I had such difficulty relating to people.
→ -
It's possible, without taking sides or playing the statesman game, to reduce destruction simply by reducing the development of technology of destruction.
→