Karl Popper Quotes About Evidence
-
Astrologers were greatly impressed, and misled, by what they believed to be confirming evidence-so much so that they were quite unimpressed by any unfavorable evidence. Moreover, by making their interpretations and prophecies sufficiently vague they were able to explain away anything that might have been a refutation of the theory had the theory and the prophecies been more precise. In order to escape falsification they destroyed the testability of their theory. It is a typical soothsayer's trick to predict things so vaguely that the predictions can hardly fail: that they become irrefutable.
→ -
If we are uncritical we shall always find what we want: we shall look for, and find, confirmations, and we shall look away from, and not see, whatever might be dangerous to our pet theories. In this way it is only too easy to obtain what appears to be overwhelming evidence in favor of a theory which, if approached critically, would have been refuted.
→ -
Almost everyone... seems to be quite sure that the differences between the methodologies of history and of the natural sciences are vast. For, we are assured, it is well known that in the natural sciences we start from observation and proceed by induction to theory. And is it not obvious that in history we proceed very differently? Yes, I agree that we proceed very differently. But we do so in the natural sciences as well.
→
Related Authors
-
Paul Feyerabend Philosopher -
Rudolf Carnap Philosopher -
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel Philosopher -
David Hume Philosopher -
Martin Heidegger Philosopher -
Immanuel Kant Philosopher -
Ludwig Wittgenstein Philosopher -
Mario Bunge Philosopher -
Karl Marx Philosopher -
Friedrich August von Hayek Economist -
Imre Lakatos Philosopher -
Rene Descartes Philosopher -
Jurgen Habermas Philosopher -
Bertrand Russell Philosopher -
George Soros Business magnate -
Plato Philosopher -
John Eccles Neurophysiologist -
Thomas Kuhn Physicist -
Kurt Gödel Logician -
Aristotle Philosopher